Notre Dame de Rouen. The façade of the Gothic Church in France. Photographer: Hippo1947. Licence: SHUTTERSTOCK.

Wednesday 12 October 2022

The Motherhood Of The Blessed Virgin Mary. Feast Day 11 October.

  


Mary” superimposed on its Hebrew source מרים (Miryam/Miriam).
Date: 14 July 2013.
Source: Own work.
Author: Jayarathina
(Wikimedia Commons)


English: Madonna on Floral Wreath.
Deutsch: Madonna im Blumenkranz.
Artist: Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640)
with
Jan Brueghel the Elder (1568–1625).
Date: Circa 1619.
Collection: Alte Pinakothek, Munich, Germany.
(Wikimedia Commons)

                       











Illustration: HERITAGE TYPE COMPANY


Feast of The Motherhood of The Blessed Virgin Mary.
11 October.
Double-Major.
Roman Breviary 1901.
Illustration: Zephyrinus.

This Feast of The Motherhood of The Blessed Virgin Mary was Celebrated, yesterday, 11 October.

Because of the state of the World, these days, Zephyrinus again brings this most beautiful Feast Day to the Readers of this Blog, with a recommendation to devote themselves to our Beloved Mother and, in addition, to adopt a regular recitation of The Divine Holy Rosary, which pleases our Beloved Mother very much.

The following Text is from:
“The Liturgical Year”;
by Abbot Guéranger, O.S.B;
Volume 14.
Time after Pentecost.
Book V.

In the 16th-Century, even amidst their many divergences, the so-called Reformers agreed in utterly rejecting all the honours paid by The Catholic Church to The Blessed Virgin Mary.

This they did on the grounds that such Veneration of The Mother detracted from the supreme Worship due to her Divine Son.

Four centuries [Editor: This book was written in the Late-19th-Century] have more than sufficed to show the result of so doing: The Son has followed The Mother !!!


The descendants of those who refused to Mary the Title and Rights of Theotokos — “Mother of God” — refuse to Jesus the Title of Son of God in the Traditional sense of the term.

Many reject His Godhead altogether, placing Him merely at the head of the line of great moral and social World-Teachers; others still retain the word “Divinity” with respect to Him, but, for them, it is no longer synonymous with “Deity”.

Holy Scripture tells us that those who first came to adore Him, Who is Son of God and Son of Mary, found Him “with Mary His Mother”.

      

At the scene of the first Miracle, at Cana, which marked the opening of His public life, “The Mother of Jesus was there”.

In the tremendous hour when all was consummated, when types and shadows gave place to the mighty reality, “there stood, by The Cross of Jesus, His Mother”.

And when the little flock, who were to be the nucleus of The Church of God, awaited in Prayer the coming of The Paraclete, Who would teach them all truth, again, it was in company with “Mary, The Mother of Jesus”.


Far from taking from the honour and love due to The Word Incarnate, devotion to Mary is a strong bulwark protecting the central doctrine. He is ever found with His Mother; where Mary is denied her Rights, sooner or later Jesus is denied His; they stand or fall together.

This was realised in 431 A.D., when, at The General Council of Ephesus, The Church condemned the Nestorian heresy, whereby the Patriarch of Constantinople, Nestorius, had taught that, since in Christ there are two persons, a Divine and a human, Mary was the Mother only of The Man Christ, and, therefore, could not be called “Mother of God”.

He therefore denied “that wondrous and substantial union of the two natures which we call hypostatic”.


English: The Virgin at Prayer.
Français : La Vierge en prière.
Date: 1640-1650.
Collection: National Gallery
Source/Photographer: Web Gallery of Art
(Wikipedia)

On the occasion of the fifteenth centenary of The Council of Ephesus, the Sovereign Pontiff, Pope Pius XI, issued the Encyclical “Lux Veritatis”, recalling the history of the heresy and commenting thus upon the dogma of the hypostatic union: “When once the doctrine of the hypostatic union is abandoned, whereon the dogmas of The Incarnation and of man’s Redemption rest and stand firm, the whole foundation of The Catholic Religion falls and comes to ruin . . .

“When once this dogma of the truth is securely established, it is easy to gather from it that, by the mystery of The Incarnation, the whole aggregate of men and mundane things has been endowed with a dignity than which certainly nothing greater can be imagined, and surely grander than that to which it was raised by the work of creation”.

Proceeding to speak of the special dignity of The Blessed Virgin Mary, the Pope emphasises that, “because she brought forth The Redeemer of mankind, she is also in a manner the most tender Mother of us all, whom Christ Our Lord deigned to have as His brothers; wherefore, we may confidently entrust to her all things that are ours, our joys, our troubles, our hopes; especially if more difficult times fall upon The Church — if Faith fail because Charity has grown cold, if private and public morals take a turn for the worse”.


In this last connection, we are reminded of another result of the loss of devotion to The Mother of God. Frequently, and truly, we hear and speak of the “paganism” of the present age. The decay of Faith has been followed inevitably by a decline in morality, and our elaborate and complex civilisation is threatened with the dissolving agent which contributed in no small measure to the overthrow of the magnificent civilisation of old Rome: Namely, the loss of the domestic virtues, the disappearance of healthy, normal,  family life, consequent upon the abandonment of the Christian ideals of marriage and parenthood.

It is a truism that one of the greatest social effects of Christianity was to raise the status of womanhood. Her legal position in the Ancient World was little better than that of a slave, and although classical literature furnishes us with examples of women who, in pagan homes, yet enjoyed high honour and affection, such are few indeed, and but serve to prove the rule.

Divorce, infanticide, general degradation of womanhood, and not infrequently of childhood, were accepted features of pagan social order.


The ideal and model of the “new woman” of the Christian dispensation was The Mother of God. It was Mary, “Mother of Fair Love”, “Madonna”, “Our Lady”, who ennobled the degenerate old civilisation, just as she tamed the fierce barbarian peoples; she it was who inspired the ideals of the later chivalry.

In Mary, all her sex was uplifted; in her motherhood, all motherhood became Blessed. Now, again, the World needs the hallowing influence of The Mother of God and of men, if “the life of the family, the beginning and the foundation of all human society” is to be preserved in all its nobility and its purity.

Desirous “to mark the Commemoration, and help to nourish the piety of Clergy and people towards the great Mother of God”, his Holiness concludes the Encyclical by establishing the new Feast of The Divine Motherhood, to be Celebrated on 11 October by The Universal Church.

Mass: Ecce, Virgo concipiet.
Preface: Of The Blessed Virgin Mary: Et te in festivitate.


  


Feast of The Motherhood of The Blessed Virgin Mary.
11 October.
Double-Major.
Roman Breviary 1901.
Illustration: Zephyrinus.

The Divine Holy Mass.

 


Illustration: FR. Z's BLOG


The British Army in North-West Europe.
Father C. V. Murphy Celebrates Mass in a Dutch field
in The Front Line, 6 October 1944.
Date: 1944.
Author: Mapham J (Sgt),
No 5 Army Film and Photographic Unit.
(Wikimedia Commons)

Wells Cathedral. An Occasional Update On England’s Magnificent Cathedrals.



The Great West Front,
Wells Cathedral.
Photo: 30 April 2014.
Source: Own work.
Attribution: Photo by DAVID ILIFF.
License: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Author: Diliff
(Wikimedia Commons)


Wells Cathedral.
Photo: 26 February 2014.
Source:Own work.
Author: Rodw
(Wikimedia Commons)

Text is from WELLS CATHEDRAL
unless stated otherwise.

The Great West Front.

The present Cathedral was begun about 1175 on a new site to the North of an old Minster Church.

Bishop Reginald de Bohun brought the idea of a revolutionary Architectural Style from France, and Wells was the first English Cathedral to be built entirely in this new Gothic Style.

The first building phase took about eighty years, building from The East End to The West End, culminating in the magnificent West Front. About 300 of its original Mediæval statues remain: a glorious theatrical Stone backdrop for Feast Day Processions.


The Jesse Window,
Wells Cathedral.
Illustration: WIKIPEDIA

The Jesse Window.

The Jesse Window at Wells Cathedral is one of the most splendid examples of 14th-Century Stained-Glass in Europe. The Window, in its dominant colours of Green and Gold, depicts a Jesse tree and shows the family and ancestors of Christ. Jesse being the father of King David.

It dates from about 1340 and, considering its age, is still remarkably intact. Fortunately, the Window has survived the vicissitudes of time and British history (narrowly escaping destruction during The English Civil War). What we see today is basically how Mediæval glaziers designed and created it and how our ancestors viewed it before us.

There have been sensitive repairs over the Centuries, of course, and steps were taken during World War II to protect the Window.

The Cathedral embarked, however, on a major project to conserve The Jesse Window in 2011. More about this ambitious project can be found in the Conservation section.


The Scissor Arches,
Wells Cathedral.
Illustration: WIKIPEDIA

The Scissor Arches.

The Scissor Arches were constructed from 1338 - 1348 as an engineering solution to a very real problem.

By 1313, a High Tower, topped by a Lead-covered Wooden Spire, had been constructed, but, as the Foundations were not stable, large cracks began to appear in the Tower structure.

In fear of a total collapse, several attempts at internal strengthening and buttressing were made, until the famous “Scissor Arches” were put in place by the Master Mason, William Joy, as a solution.

A Little Levity To Lighten Your Day . . .



“Bred Any Good Rooks, Lately ?”

Tuesday 11 October 2022

The Feast Day Of The Motherhood Of The Blessed Virgin Mary. From The Roman Breviary (Summer 1879). 11 October.

 


Text from The Roman Breviary.
Translated out of Latin into English by
John, Marquess of Bute, K.T.
Volume II.
Summer.
1879.


English: Madonna on Floral Wreath.
Deutsch: Madonna im Blumenkranz.
Artist: Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640)
with
Jan Brueghel the Elder (1568–1625).
Date: Circa 1619.
Collection: Alte Pinakothek, Munich, Germany.
(Wikimedia Commons)


Feast Day Of The Motherhood of The Blessed Virgin.
11 October.

Note: In the 1879 Roman Breviary, prior to the reforms of Pope Saint Pius X, this Feast Day was Celebrated on The Second Sunday of October.

Greater-Double.

All from The Common Office for The Blessed Virgin Mary’s Feasts (Page 894), except the following.

Included within the Office for this Feast Day was the following:


First Vespers:

Antiphons, Chapter, and Prayer, all from Lauds.

Versicle: Blessed art thou among women.

Response: And Blessed is the fruit of thy womb.

Antiphon at The Song of The Blessed Virgin: Let us keep glad holiday in honour of The Motherhood of The Blessed Mary, always a Virgin.

A Commemoration is made of the Sunday.

Mattins:

Invitatory: Let us keep holiday in honour of The Motherhood of The Blessed Mary * Let us Worship Christ, her Son, and her Lord, and ours.


Hymn:

(Translation by the Late Rev. E. Caswall).

The Saviour left high Heaven to dwell
Within The Virgin’s womb . . .

First Nocturn:

First Lesson:


The Lesson is taken from The Book of Ecclesiasticus (xxiv. 5.).

I came out of the mouth of The Most High before there was any creature . . .

First Responsory: O Holy Virgin Mary, happy art thou, and right worthy of all praise, for out of thee rose the Sun of righteousness, even Christ our God, by Whom we are saved and redeemed.

Versicle: Let us keep glad holiday in honour of The Motherhood of The Blessed Virgin Mary.

Response: For out of thee rose the Sun of righteousness, even Christ our God, by Whom we are saved and redeemed.

Then follows the rest of the Office for the Feast.

The Motherhood Of The Blessed Virgin Mary. Feast Day 11 October.

 


Mary” superimposed on its Hebrew source מרים (Miryam/Miriam).
Date: 14 July 2013.
Source: Own work.
Author: Jayarathina
(Wikimedia Commons)


English: Madonna on Floral Wreath.
Deutsch: Madonna im Blumenkranz.
Artist: Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640)
with
Jan Brueghel the Elder (1568–1625).
Date: Circa 1619.
Collection: Alte Pinakothek, Munich, Germany.
(Wikimedia Commons)

                       











Illustration: HERITAGE TYPE COMPANY

The following Text is from:
“The Liturgical Year”;
by Abbot Guéranger, O.S.B;
Volume 14.
Time after Pentecost.
Book V.

In the 16th-Century, even amidst their many divergences, the so-called Reformers agreed in utterly rejecting all the honours paid by The Catholic Church to The Blessed Virgin Mary.

This they did on the grounds that such Veneration of The Mother detracted from the supreme Worship due to her Divine Son.

Four centuries [Editor: This book was written in the Late-19th-Century] have more than sufficed to show the result of so doing: The Son has followed The Mother !!!


The descendants of those who refused to Mary the Title and Rights of Theotokos — “Mother of God” — refuse to Jesus the Title of Son of God in the Traditional sense of the term.

Many reject His Godhead altogether, placing Him merely at the head of the line of great moral and social World-Teachers; others still retain the word “Divinity” with respect to Him, but, for them, it is no longer synonymous with “Deity”.

Holy Scripture tells us that those who first came to adore Him, Who is Son of God and Son of Mary, found Him “with Mary His Mother”.

      

At the scene of the first Miracle, at Cana, which marked the opening of His public life, “The Mother of Jesus was there”.

In the tremendous hour when all was consummated, when types and shadows gave place to the mighty reality, “there stood, by The Cross of Jesus, His Mother”.

And when the little flock, who were to be the nucleus of The Church of God, awaited in Prayer the coming of The Paraclete, Who would teach them all truth, again, it was in company with “Mary, The Mother of Jesus”.


Far from taking from the honour and love due to The Word Incarnate, devotion to Mary is a strong bulwark protecting the central doctrine. He is ever found with His Mother; where Mary is denied her Rights, sooner or later Jesus is denied His; they stand or fall together.

This was realised in 431 A.D., when, at The General Council of Ephesus, The Church condemned the Nestorian heresy, whereby the Patriarch of Constantinople, Nestorius, had taught that, since in Christ there are two persons, a Divine and a human, Mary was the Mother only of The Man Christ, and, therefore, could not be called “Mother of God”.

He therefore denied “that wondrous and substantial union of the two natures which we call hypostatic”.


English: The Virgin at Prayer.
Français : La Vierge en prière.
Date: 1640-1650.
Collection: National Gallery
Source/Photographer: Web Gallery of Art
(Wikipedia)

On the occasion of the fifteenth centenary of The Council of Ephesus, the Sovereign Pontiff, Pope Pius XI, issued the Encyclical “Lux Veritatis”, recalling the history of the heresy and commenting thus upon the dogma of the hypostatic union: “When once the doctrine of the hypostatic union is abandoned, whereon the dogmas of The Incarnation and of man’s Redemption rest and stand firm, the whole foundation of The Catholic Religion falls and comes to ruin . . .

“When once this dogma of the truth is securely established, it is easy to gather from it that, by the mystery of The Incarnation, the whole aggregate of men and mundane things has been endowed with a dignity than which certainly nothing greater can be imagined, and surely grander than that to which it was raised by the work of creation”.

Proceeding to speak of the special dignity of The Blessed Virgin Mary, the Pope emphasises that, “because she brought forth The Redeemer of mankind, she is also in a manner the most tender Mother of us all, whom Christ Our Lord deigned to have as His brothers; wherefore, we may confidently entrust to her all things that are ours, our joys, our troubles, our hopes; especially if more difficult times fall upon The Church — if Faith fail because Charity has grown cold, if private and public morals take a turn for the worse”.


In this last connection, we are reminded of another result of the loss of devotion to The Mother of God. Frequently, and truly, we hear and speak of the “paganism” of the present age. The decay of Faith has been followed inevitably by a decline in morality, and our elaborate and complex civilisation is threatened with the dissolving agent which contributed in no small measure to the overthrow of the magnificent civilisation of old Rome: Namely, the loss of the domestic virtues, the disappearance of healthy, normal,  family life, consequent upon the abandonment of the Christian ideals of marriage and parenthood.

It is a truism that one of the greatest social effects of Christianity was to raise the status of womanhood. Her legal position in the Ancient World was little better than that of a slave, and although classical literature furnishes us with examples of women who, in pagan homes, yet enjoyed high honour and affection, such are few indeed, and but serve to prove the rule.

Divorce, infanticide, general degradation of womanhood, and not infrequently of childhood, were accepted features of pagan social order.


The ideal and model of the “new woman” of the Christian dispensation was The Mother of God. It was Mary, “Mother of Fair Love”, “Madonna”, “Our Lady”, who ennobled the degenerate old civilisation, just as she tamed the fierce barbarian peoples; she it was who inspired the ideals of the later chivalry.

In Mary, all her sex was uplifted; in her motherhood, all motherhood became Blessed. Now, again, the World needs the hallowing influence of The Mother of God and of men, if “the life of the family, the beginning and the foundation of all human society” is to be preserved in all its nobility and its purity.

Desirous “to mark the Commemoration, and help to nourish the piety of Clergy and people towards the great Mother of God”, his Holiness concludes the Encyclical by establishing the new Feast of The Divine Motherhood, to be Celebrated on 11 October by The Universal Church.

Mass: Ecce, Virgo concipiet.
Preface: Of The Blessed Virgin Mary: Et te in festivitate.


  

Total Restoration Of The Tridentine Rite. Exalting Tradition And Refuting Rupture.

 




Peter Kwasniewski announces the launch of his latest book: “The Once And Future Roman Rite. Returning To The Traditional Latin Liturgy After Seventy Years Of Exile”.




Peter Kwasniewski writes:

I am pleased to announce to readers the release of my latest book, The Once and Future Roman Rite: Returning to the Traditional Latin Liturgy after Seventy Years of Exile (TAN Books, 2022).

Although it was initially conceived as a response to the fiftieth anniversary of the Novus Ordo (1969-2019), it developed over time into a full-on response to the numerous errors and lies of progressive liturgists as we find them regurgitated in Traditionis Custodes and its accompanying letter.

The fruit of decades of research, experience, reflection, and debate, Once and Future Roman Rite argues that the guiding principle for all authentic Christian liturgy is sacred Tradition, which originates from Christ and is unfolded theologically and liturgically by The Holy Spirit throughout the life of The Church, in each age and across the ages.



The prominent identifying traits of all traditional rites, Eastern and Western—including, of course, the classical Roman Rite—are markedly and designedly absent from or optional in the Novus Ordo, estranging it from their company and making it impossible to call it “the Roman rite” at all.

Paul VI’s new liturgical books, drafted in unseemly haste by an audacious committee of arrogant men, who placed themselves above and outside of the stream of tradition as its jury, judge, and executioner, visited upon the long-suffering Roman Catholic Faithful a hasty and far-reaching reform permeated with nominalism, voluntarism, Protestantism, rationalism, antiquarianism, hyperpapalism, and other modern errors.

But this much is always true and will always be true: man is not master over divine liturgy; rather, all of us, from the lowest-ranking Layman to the Pope, himself, are called to be stewards of God’s best and choicest gifts. This law, in turn, imposes genuine moral and ecclesial duties upon us and bestows corresponding rights.



The only possible Catholic response to this crisis of rupture is a full return to the Roman rite in its robust perennial richness as codified after The Council of Trent (i.e., the pre-1955 form of the rite: hence “Seventy Years of Exile”).

No special permission is or could ever be needed to embrace this heritage and to hand it down to future generations. Fidelity to the traditional Latin Liturgy is, at its root, fidelity to The Roman Church as such and to Christ, Himself, Who has inspired the growth and perfection of our religious rites for two thousand years.

In addition to its preface, twelve chapters, and epilogue, the book contains a foreword by Martin Mosebach, nine reproduced artworks, several diagrams, an appendix of (highly revealing) texts by Paul VI on the liturgical reform, a topical bibliography, and a detailed index.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...